Chapter 1 The special theory of relativity

نویسنده

  • Jayant V. Narlikar
چکیده

1905 is often described as Einstein’s annus mirabilis: a wonderful year in which he came up with three remarkable ideas. These were the Brownian motion in fluids, the photoelectric effect and the special theory of relativity. Each of these was of a basic nature and also had a wide impact on physics. In this chapter we will be concerned with special relativity, which was arguably the most fundamental of the above three ideas. It is perhaps a remarkable circumstance that, ever since the initiation of modern science with the works of Galileo, Kepler and Newton, there has emerged a feeling towards the end of each century that the end of physics is near: that is, most in-depth fundamental discoveries have been made and only detailed ‘scratching at the surface’ remains. This feeling emerged towards the end of the eighteenth century, when Newtonian laws of motion and gravitation, the studies in optics and acoustics, etc. had provided explanations of most observed phenomena. The nineteenth century saw the development of thermodynamics, the growth in understanding of electrodynamics, wave motion, etc., none of which had been expected in the previous century. So the feeling again grew that the end of physics was nigh. As we know, the twentieth century saw the emergence of two theories, fundamental but totally unexpected by the stalwarts of the nineteenth century, viz., relativity and quantum theory. Finally, the success of the attempt to unify electromagnetism with the weak interaction led many twentieth-century physicists to announce that the end of physics was not far off. That hope has not materialized even though the twenty-first century has begun.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Principle of Relativity: From Ungar’s Gyrolanguage for Physics to Weaving Computation in Mathematics

‎This paper extends the scope of algebraic computation based on a non standard $times$ to ‎the more basic case of a non standard $+$‎, ‎where standard means associative ‎and commutative‎. ‎Two physically meaningful examples of a non standard $+$ are ‎provided by the observation of motion in Special Relativity‎, ‎from either ‎outside (3D) or inside (2D or more)‎, ‎We revisit the ``gyro''-theory ...

متن کامل

Bulk Viscous Bianchi Type VI0 Cosmological Model in the Self-creation Theory of Gravitation and in the General Theory of Relativity

In the second self-creation theory of gravitation and in the general theory of relativity, Bianchi type VI0 cosmological model in the presence of viscous fluid is studied. An exact solution of the field equations is given by considering the cosmological model yields a constant decelerations parameter q=constant and the coefficients of the metric are taken as A(t)=[c1t+c<su...

متن کامل

Lorentzian theories vs. Einsteinian special relativity – a logico-empiricist reconstruction

1. It is widely believed that the principal difference between Einstein’s special relativity and its contemporary rival Lorentz-type theories was that while the Lorentztype theories were also capable of “explaining away” the null result of the Michelson– Morley experiment and other experimental findings by means of the distortions of moving measuring-rods and moving clocks, special relativity r...

متن کامل

Taking Times Out: Tense Logic as a Theory of Time

Ulrich Meyer’s fascinating book The Nature of Time uses a novel development of Arthur Prior’s tense logic to argue for a ‘modal’ account of time. Meyer’s metaphysical view requires tense primitivism (the view that truths are irreducibly tensed) and so, in Quine’s turn of phrase, trades ontology for ideology. Meyer’s temporal metaphysics eschews ontological commitment to temporal instants throug...

متن کامل

Logic of Space-Time and Relativity Theory

2 Special relativity 4 2.1 Motivation for special relativistic kinematics in place of Newtonian kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.3 Axiomatization Specrel of special relativity in first-order logic 15 2.4 Characteristic differences between Newtonian and special relativistic kinematics . . . ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010